The Greek Courier
Iran Targets Busiest International Airport as UN Demands Halt to Attacks on Gulf Neighbors
As the conflict with Iran escalates, the U.S. and Israel continue to face retaliatory attacks from Tehran, which today targeted some of the region's vital infrastructures, including the world’s busiest international airport and three oil tankers. The Iranian actions come in response to President Trump's assertion that the U.S. has “won” the war and that Tehran “didn’t expect anything like this.” Despite claims of a decimated Iranian military, the country has successfully launched strikes against significant targets, raising questions about its ongoing capabilities.
On March 11, Iran's attacks included a missile strike that ignited a major fire at Bahrain’s Muharraq Airport, prompting authorities to advise residents to stay indoors due to smoke risk. Similar incidents occurred at Iraq's Basra port, where an attack resulted in the death of one individual and the suspension of operations at all oil terminals. This escalation reflects Iran's strategy to inflict economic pain to pressure the U.S. and Israel into ceasing hostilities.
Only today, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) actively targeted 3 commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for about 20% of the world's oil supply. Reports also confirm that the Thai-flagged cargo ship Mayuree Naree was struck by projectiles, leading to a fire and the disappearance of crew members. Other vessels, including tankers carrying Iraqi fuel oil, have also been attacked in Gulf waters, with at least 16 ships reportedly hit since the conflict began.
President Trump’s claims that Iran is devastated seem at odds with the significant military actions still being taken by Tehran. Experts suggest that Iran has retained enough military resources to sustain its counter-offensive. The ability to hit both airports and commercial vessels indicates a more resilient military capability than Trump's statements suggest.
In response to rising tensions and threats to global oil supplies, the UN Security Council voted unanimously to condemn Iran’s “egregious attacks” on its Gulf neighbors, further isolating Tehran on the international stage. Although the vote included abstentions from China and Russia—two countries that traditionally support Iran—its wording emphasized an unequivocal rejection of Iran's recent military actions.
Three commercial ships damaged by "unknown projectiles" in Strait of Hormuz | BBC News
The logistical realities of the conflict show both sides maintaining significant operational capabilities. The Pentagon reported that the first week of the war had cost the U.S. $11.3 billion, including $5 billion spent on munitions.
As the war continues, rising oil prices create a ripple effect across the global economy, exacerbating inflationary pressures. The International Energy Agency has agreed to release 400 million barrels from emergency reserves, marking the largest such release in history. The U.S. plans to tap 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve to mitigate soaring prices that are already impacting American consumers.
Amid these tensions, drone attacks have also been reported targeting Israeli cities, with the Israeli military responding with airstrikes. Reports indicate heavy weaponry exchanges between Hezbollah and Israel, significantly increasing casualties on both sides. The humanitarian impact in Lebanon has been severe, with over 634 deaths since the conflict began.
As the situation develops, President Trump’s confidence in a quick resolution contrasts sharply with the realities on the ground, where both sides seem entrenched in a protracted conflict. His aggressive military stance and rhetoric indicate a commitment to escalating the campaign against Iran, partly aimed at controlling vital shipping lanes like the Strait of Hormuz, through which a substantial portion of the world's oil travels.
ANALYSIS
Comparing Claims with Facts
President Trump has repeatedly claimed the war is "very complete, pretty much" and that the U.S. has "won," suggesting there is "practically nothing left" to target in Iran. However, the facts on the ground contradict this narrative of near-total victory:
Continued Strikes: Iran continues to launch coordinated drone and missile attacks against Israel, American bases, and Gulf Arab states, demonstrating an active and operational military capability.
Oil Market Chaos: The successful disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on oil infrastructure have sent benchmark oil prices surging past $100 per barrel, a clear indicator that the conflict is far from over and is creating severe economic consequences.
UN Condemnation: The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding a halt to Iran’s attacks on Gulf nations, reflecting that the conflict is actively widening and threatening international peace, which contradicts a narrative of a swiftly concluded operation.
Iran's continued ability to strike targets suggests that while its conventional military may be degraded, its ability to conduct asymmetric warfare—particularly via drones, missiles, and maritime operations—remains potent enough to inflict significant economic and regional damage.
The Final Objective: Control and Attrition
Based on Trump’s statements, the final objective of the operation appears multifaceted, heavily centered on securing the Strait of Hormuz and forcing regime capitulation.
Control of the Strait of Hormuz: Trump has explicitly stated he is considering taking over the strait and warned Iran that any disruption to oil shipments will result in strikes "twenty times harder," with consequences that would make it "virtually impossible for Iran to ever be built back, as a Nation, again." This suggests that guaranteeing unimpeded oil flow—and thereby controlling the global energy lever—is a primary, non-negotiable goal.
Forcing Unconditional Surrender: The overarching goal remains the "unconditional surrender" demanded early in the conflict. By systematically hitting infrastructure (as per the "Putin strategy" mentioned previously) and threatening further catastrophic strikes on electricity and other critical systems, the objective is to generate enough internal and economic pressure to force the new leadership to capitulate to U.S. demands.
Ground Invasion as a Contingency: While Trump has not explicitly announced an imminent ground invasion, his threats to hit targets so devastating that they prevent Iran from rebuilding suggest a willingness to escalate to the highest levels of force if the current campaign of aerial and maritime pressure fails to achieve the desired political outcome.
After watching the BBC News documentary, one cannot help but agree with the analyst, suggesting that if Trump wants to disrupt the flow of Iranian oil, he must invade, not blow up, Kharg Island with special operations teams.
The logistical challenge of a ground invasion through the rough Iranian terrain remains a major hurdle, but the intensity of the current campaign suggests that all options remain on the table if the attrition strategy does not yield a quick end to the war.
"Trump Claims Victory; Iran Says, "Hold My Missile – Watch these Beautiful Explosions Rocking Bahrain Airport!"


No comments:
Post a Comment