Enough With The Bigotry,
Enough With The Lies
October 18, 2026
By Yiannis Damellos and Mars Strangelove Jr.
Source: The Washington Post
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has put $1 million behind Abdul El-Sayed's Michigan Senate campaign, declaring that she does not want to reach November 4, wishing she had done more to counter what she calls smears against the Democratic candidate.
The transfer, announced October 16, is more than a financial contribution. It is a public intervention by one of the Democratic Party's most prominent progressives in a competitive Senate race where the candidate's economic message has increasingly been overshadowed by attacks concerning his Muslim faith, Egyptian heritage and support for Palestinians.
Ocasio-Cortez said she was transferring the money from her own campaign to the Abdul for Michigan Victory Fund. Speaking at a campaign event, she described the move as evidence that El-Sayed's supporters were not alone.
Good timing. El-Sayed's campaign is competing for a Senate seat that could help determine control of the chamber, while Republicans have made his religious identity a recurring subject of political attacks.
He answered the question. The controversy continued.
At a campaign event in Michigan on Saturday, a young voter asked El-Sayed whether he would disavow the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist movement that once governed Egypt.
“Sure. Yeah, absolutely,” El-Sayed replied.
He then challenged the premise behind the question, asking why he was being singled out and whether the questioner assumed that his Muslim faith meant he might owe allegiance to an organization rather than the U.S. Constitution.
The exchange, reported by The Washington Post on October 18, became a widely circulated campaign video. El-Sayed compared the scrutiny of his religious identity with questions historically directed at John F. Kennedy over whether his Catholic faith would determine his presidential decisions. His argument was that Americans should be judged by their commitments and conduct, not presumed to have divided loyalties because of their religion.
El Sayed deserves to be taken seriously. Candidates should face scrutiny about their policies, political associations and public statements. But a demand that a candidate repeatedly disavow an organization because he is Muslim raises a different question: would the same test be applied to a Christian candidate simply because of the candidate's faith?
El-Sayed's answer was explicit. The subsequent debate has focused less on whether he disavowed the Brotherhood than on whether his answer satisfied those determined to keep the issue alive.
The political use of an allegation
President Donald Trump called El-Sayed a “jihadist” at a campaign rally in Georgia on Friday, according to The Washington Post. El-Sayed has also faced questions about claims concerning his family. He has denied personal or family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, and in a recent interview dismissed social-media allegations about his mother as hearsay.
Abdul El-Sayed ws born October 31, 1984, in Rochester Hills, Michigan. El-Sayed's father, Mohamed, grew up in Alexandria, Egypt, and immigrated to the United States for graduate studies. His mother, Fatten El-Komy, is also from Egypt. I dont expect all Republicans to know this, but Alexandria is the most liberal and multicultural Egyptian city. Moreover, an accusation is not evidence. Nor does a candidate's Egyptian ancestry establish political allegiance to Egypt or to an Egyptian movement. Unless you are a sicko thinking like MAGA.
The fair standard is the same one applied to every candidate: examine the evidence, ask specific questions and report the answers accurately. When allegations about a person's religion or ancestry substitute for evidence of conduct, political scrutiny risks becoming religious prejudice.
Why AOC is putting her money behind him
Ocasio-Cortez's intervention also reflects a strategic argument within the Democratic Party.
El-Sayed has campaigned on healthcare, affordability and the influence of wealthy donors. His message seeks to connect economic insecurity with the political power of corporations and billionaires. AOC has presented her support as part of a broader effort to build a coalition around those issues rather than allow the campaign to be defined by attacks on the candidate's identity.
His campaign has also received support from Senator Bernie Sanders. Former president Barack Obama is scheduled to campaign with El-Sayed in Detroit on October 24, according to The Washington Post. That is a significant show of support, although a joint campaign appearance should not automatically be described as a formal endorsement unless the campaign explicitly identifies it as one.
The involvement of figures associated with different parts of the Democratic coalition suggests that El-Sayed's candidacy has significance beyond the Michigan race. The question is whether an economic message centred on ordinary households can hold together progressive activists, established party figures and voters who may not agree on every issue.
The money also matters in practical terms. The Michigan contest has become exceptionally expensive, and the transfer gives El-Sayed's campaign additional resources at a critical point in the election cycle. It does not guarantee victory, but it demonstrates that influential Democrats are willing to invest in his candidacy.
The standard should be the same for everyone
El-Sayed's campaign presents voters with questions about healthcare, living costs, corporate power and the role of government. Those are legitimate and critical subjects for debate. His positions on Israel and Palestine, his public record and his policy proposals are also legitimate subjects for examination.
But the standard should be consistent. A Muslim candidate should not have to establish his constitutional loyalty through a religious test that is not routinely imposed on candidates of other faiths.
The United States has a long history of political suspicion directed at religious minorities. Kennedy confronted questions about Catholicism in 1960; Muslim Americans have faced their own wave of scrutiny in the decades since September 11, 2001. The circumstances differ, but the underlying constitutional principle remains the same: religious belief does not, by itself, establish a person's political loyalties.
Ocasio-Cortez has chosen to make that principle part of her intervention in Michigan. The $1 million contribution gives her position a financial consequence as well as a rhetorical one.
The question now is whether the campaign can return attention to the issues El-Sayed says matter most to voters—and whether voters will judge him by his proposals and conduct rather than by allegations that have not been substantiated.
No comments:
Post a Comment