Trump Puts Russia Sanctions He Just Signed Into Law on Hold. Why? To “Make America Great Again?

Editorial

October 16, 2026

Trump signed a bipartisan Russia sanctions bill, then suspended its implementation two days before the statutory deadline, invoking the national interest. Trump, has not explained how the suspension serves that interest or how it will Make America Great Again.

The most revealing aspect of Donald Trump’s recent decision is not just that he has put major sanctions against Russia on hold. It’s that he signed the legislation, led Congress and America’s European allies to believe additional pressure on Moscow was forthcoming, and then cited national interest as the reason to suspend key parts of its implementation. Additionally, he has promoted a deal to purchase Russian diesel and has overseen a dispute regarding restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Starshield.

The combined effects of these developments deserve further investigation, as pressure on Russia is being considerably eased while Ukraine remains dependent on American decisions over technology essential to its battlefield operations.

I’m unsure how much longer Trump can maintain his stance on Russia, but it’s crucial that Washington’s policies remain accountable to the voters and elected officials in the US, rather than solely to presidential unexplained tactics and whims. A law that is signed but then largely disregarded, an energy deal that financially benefits Russia, and the ambiguity surrounding military intel for Ukraine all convey a troubling message: that America’s commitments can shift unpredictably—even in the midst of a conflict - to advantageously favor a rival.

Trump may contend that he is safeguarding American interests, reducing energy costs, or maintaining diplomatic flexibility. However, it is essential for him to clarify how the weakening of these crucial sanctions actually advances those interests, and what tangible concessions are expected from Russia in return. While Kyiv endures relentless attacks from Russian drones and missiles, the implications stretch far beyond Ukraine. If Moscow perceives that it can withstand Western pressure while Washington frequently alters its stance, the credibility of American policy, the cohesion of NATO, and the trust of its allies will all be jeopardized.

We must ask ourselves whether the course Trump is choosing really benefits American society, strengthens America’s position in the world, or instead, drives a wedge into NATO's foundation and gives Vladimir Putin greater room to manoeuvre and wage war.