Source: Politico
Voting records from Palm Beach County show that Trump requested a mail ballot in late July and returned it on Aug. 13, casting his vote in Florida’s Republican primary. This is not the first time Trump has voted by mail in Florida; he also used a mail ballot in a Palm Beach County special election earlier this year.
Trump has repeatedly called for sharply limiting mail-in voting, despite relying on the system when it suits him. He has falsely claimed that mail ballots are inherently corrupt and has pushed Congress to pass the SAVE America Act, which would require photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections. His administration has also asked the Supreme Court to revive an executive order restricting mail-in voting ahead of the midterms.
The White House says Trump’s use of a mail ballot is justified because he is a Florida resident who spends much of his time at the White House in Washington. Spokesperson Olivia Wales argued that the SAVE America Act would still allow exceptions for people who are ill, disabled, serving in the military or traveling.
But that explanation underscores the contradiction. Trump is not merely arguing that mail voting should be available in limited circumstances; he has repeatedly portrayed the broader practice as inherently susceptible to fraud. Yet he has used the same system himself—more than once.
Florida law currently allows any eligible registered voter to request a vote-by-mail ballot. Even though Republicans control the state Legislature and have enacted restrictions on ballot collection, ballot requests and identification requirements, lawmakers have not adopted Trump’s preferred sweeping limits.
The issue, then, is not whether Trump is legally entitled to vote by mail. He is. The question is why a voting method he considers too corrupt for widespread use is acceptable when he uses it himself. Trump’s personal reliance on mail voting makes his broader campaign against the practice look less like a matter of principle and more like a double standard.
No comments:
Post a Comment